Exposing Myths…Herd Immunity

One of my favorites: The Myth of Herd Immunity
This myth goes hand in hand with a lot of other similar misconceptions.

 The Myth of Herd Immunity leads us to believe that unvaccinated populations will bring back epidemics of deadly diseases. This myth also makes us believe that unvaccinated children are a threat to society and that unvaccinated children pose a risk to vaccinated children. I’ll tackle this whole discombobulated mess of a myth in one post, through the research, knowledge, science, & expertise of a doctor, a pediatrician, & a neurosurgeon.

What are we told?

  • We often hear statements from public health officials like “Clusters of unvaccinated children are not only in potential danger themselves, but are also a threat to the herd immunity”.
  • Authorities argue that parents should vaccinate their children to protect society as a whole from epidemics.
  • According to public health officials, “parents who reject vaccines don’t consider the effect of their child on the rest of society”.
  • We are told that for the shots to work, everyone must play along. And parents who decline the vaccines, are somehow reaping the benefits from those who are vaccinated.

What is truth? 

Dr. O’Shea, in his book: “Vaccination is Not Immunization” explains: 
“Do not make the error of many pediatricians or journalists who talk about herd immunity as though it refers to the immunity that proceeds from a large group of people being vaccinated. The calculated deception behind this common misnomer is that if you don’t know what herd immunity is, you’ll buy their illusion: that the unvaccinated child can take advantage of the herd who have been vaccinated. This is well though-out propaganda. True herd immunity is a term which indicates that a disease has burned itself out within a population, as with plague, smallpox, typhus-every infectious disease in history. The herd has become immune. Natural selection. It has to do with nature, not with manmade vaccines. Don’t be fooled again”

Dr. Palevsky (board-certified pediatrician) explains:
“This whole concept of herd immunity is very interesting, because we were taught that herd immunity occurs because a certain percentage of a population gets an active illness. Therefore by a certain percentage of getting the active illness, they impart a protection onto the remaining part of the population that has not gotten the illness yet. And so the herd that is getting the illness is shedding the illness and protecting those who have not gotten it.

In vaccine science, we are extrapolating or concluding that if we vaccinate a certain percentage of people, we are imparting protection on those who have not been vaccinated. And that has NOT been shown to be true, because the true herd immunity in theory is based on an ACTIVE DISEASE, and we know that despite what we’re taught, vaccination does not mimic the natural disease.

So we cannot use the same model of herd immunity in a natural disease in the vaccination policy. But unfortunately, we do use it even though it doesn’t have scientific backing.

What’s most interesting to me is that the entire concept of herd immunity fails to acknowledge that there is a life cycle of the viruses and the bacteria all on their own, and that what turns them on and off may have nothing to do with the percentage of people who have been infected.

We fail to include that viruses have a life cycle, and that they are in relationship to other organisms and to us. Something activates them and something actually stops them, and it has nothing necessarily to do with the percentage of people who would have the illness or who have been vaccinated.

… It is preposterous to think that a child who is vaccinated no longer carries the bacteria or the viruses that they have been vaccinated against. If, in fact, children are vaccinated, then why are parents and public health authorities afraid that non-vaccinated children are somehow carrying something that their children are not, when they should feel comfortable that their children are vaccinated? You can’t have it both ways”.

Dr. Blaylock (board certified neurosurgeon) explains: 
“In the original description of herd immunity, the protection to the population at large occurred only if people contracted the infections naturally. The reason is that naturally acquired immunity lasts for a lifetime. Vaccine proponents quickly latched onto this concept and applied it to vaccine-induced immunity. But there was one major problem: Vaccine-induced immunity lasts for only a relatively short period…

This is why they quietly began to suggest  boosters for most vaccines, even the common childhood infections such as chickenpox, measles, mumps, and rubella.

Then they discovered an even greater problem: The boosters were lasting for only two years or less. This is why we are now seeing mandates that youth entering colleges have multiple vaccines, even those that they insisted gave lifelong immunity, such as the MMR. The same is being suggested for full-grown adults. Ironically, no one in the media or medical field is asking what is going on. They just accept that it must be done.

That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. When I was in medical school, we were taught that all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given.

What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. At least 50 percent of the population has been unprotected for decades.

If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95 percent. Yet we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50 percent or less of the population having vaccine protection.

Herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades, and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations”.

Where is the Logic?

Take Pertussis (whooping cough)
Dr. Palevsky explains this very well:

Do children vaccinated with the pertussis vaccine somehow stop carrying pertussis bacteria in their airways simply because they’ve been vaccinated?

Do pertussis vaccines stop vaccinated children from transmitting the pertussis bacteria to other people?

Do pertussis bacteria disappear from society once vaccination rates are high?
NO: Vaccination rates for pertussis have no impact on whether the pertussis bacteria are in the air or not, or whether or not we breathe them in. The presence of the pertussis bacteria, and the exposure to them, are in no way affected by vaccination status or vaccination rates.

Do unvaccinated children, because they are unvaccinated, carry the bacteria in their airways, which vaccinated children are somehow no longer believed to be carrying because they’ve been vaccinated?

Do unvaccinated children transmit the pertussis bacteria to other children by the mere fact that they are not vaccinated?
NO: Air is air. Air is free to breathe. We breathe in whatever is in the air. And, vaccinated and unvaccinated children are equally exposed to breathing in pertussis bacteria.

Anyone who poses as science the idea that unvaccinated children pose a threat to the population because they are unvaccinated and are more likely to transmit a disease to the rest of the population, is misleading you, promulgating myth, and inaccurate. Vaccination with the pertussis vaccine does not exonerate anyone from carrying the pertussis bacteria, or prevent them from being exposed to the bacteria.

The fact is that vaccination does NOT stop you from carrying bacteria or viruses in your nose, throat, intestines, airway, skin, or in your body. We have been made to believe that if you’re vaccinated, you won’t carry the viruses, and therefore, others will be protected because you’re vaccinated. This belief is NOT based on scientific fact.

You can’t vaccinate believing that your children are protected and then feel that your children are not protected because somehow, some non-vaccinated child is carrying some secret organism that one else is carrying. You can’t have it both ways. It just doesn’t make any sense.


6 thoughts on “Exposing Myths…Herd Immunity

  1. Love it!!! keep it coming!! You could not have started this series at a better time:) God is so good…thank you for spreading truth!!


  2. Speaking as someone who was born in 1944 before many of the vaccines of today were routinely given to infants, I remember having chicken pox, measles and even whooping cough before age 10. The only vaccine I ever remember getting was a polio shot. Except for those childhood diseases, I rarely ever get sick anymore. Maybe a cold now and then but I just don’t catch the viruses going around. Still have my tonsils, too. I guess the herd I grew up with had developed a natural immunity. My daughter was born in 1964 and got the DPT shots. She has also had measles and allergies so I feel that vaccines didn’t do her any good.


  3. I’ve got a myth I’d love to see you bust. I’ve read plenty of books on the subject but would like your take on it – that the massive rise in autism is not an epidemic but simply due to better recognition (diagnosis or by teachers etc who are more aware now what to look for). I’m sick to death of people telling me my autistic son and all his autistic friends have always existed but either previous generations of parents were too vague to notice or we are all too over-anxious and seek diagnosis like a child seeks candy. Someone, somewhere needs to start noticing the scary numbers going steadily up and up!


    1. Everyone should read Dan Olmsted and Mark Blaxill’s book The Age of Autism, about how mercury has caused all sorts of ills since it became a popular medicine in the eighteenth century. Autism did not exist before the mercury-containing diphtheria vaccine of the 1930s, and the first cohort of autistic children examined by Dr. Leo Kanner, who coined the term autism in his landmark article published in 1943: these children were the first to display the characteristics of autism, and they had all been exposed to mercury either in the diphtheria vaccine or their parents had worked to develop the first mercury-containing fungicides in the 1930s. It’s laughable that the “authorities” are trying to attribute the “apparent” increase in autism to better diagnosing. There was no autism visible when I was a child in the 1960s. Rates were only two or three in ten thousand through the 1970s (up from zero in 1930, but rising with the increased use of the mercury-containing DPT), and then went through the roof when the hep-B at birth started in 1991, the HIb in 1988, the MMR quadrupled its amount of mumps virus in 1990 (it never had mercury as a live vaccine), then they added Prevnar, hep-B, rotavirus, varicella (also live, also very dangerous), Tdaps for those over seven, more and more of them in the face of the vaccine’s ineffectiveness at preventing pertussis, HPV, meningococcal: how can anyone be surprised that the number and severity of autoimmune diseases caused by vaccines, and encephalitic brain damage, and heavy metal poisoning, have gone up?

      The attempt to say autism rates are not really skyrocketing, it’s all just better diagnosis, is just a frantic attempt by Big Pharma to keep the vaccine profits rolling in. Autism rates have tripled in just the past ten years, and I can affirm that all the doctors, magazines, news programs, Parents as Teachers educators, and school personnel, were fully aware of the symptoms of autism at that time, when my autistic daughter was little.

      Parents must be aware of the symptoms of dangerous diseases, like a stiff neck possibly meaning meningitis. They should read Aviva Jill Romm and Wendy Lydall’s books on caring for children with vaccine-preventable diseases, with the symptoms of the diseases. We must not forget that the diseases can kill or disable, but in my opinion and that of most other parents of vaccine-damaged children, it’s better to be well-informed about natural and homeopathic remedies, and when it’s advisable to seek conventional medical care, than to risk permanent disability or death caused by vaccines.


      1. For the Romans, their downfall was Lead, for Americans it may be Mercury. I read somewhere that mercury has been found in High Fructose Corn Syrup which is in everything that kids consume. The world has to wake up and smell the destruction.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s